Archive for January, 2008

Why Edwards dropped out

January 31, 2008

One of the big questions across the blogs yesterday in the wake of Edwards' exit from the race, was: Why? Why now? What made him change his mind when just the day before, in Tulsa and elsewhere, he vowed he was in for “the long haul”?

If there's one thing about John Edwards that is abundantly clear from his entire life, it's that he's not a quitter … so, then, why did he quit the race suddenly, before the one day that might possible turn the tide a little his way?

Well, of course none of us know the details of his thinking until and if he chooses to share them with us, but that doesn't stop folks like me from speculating, does it?

Naturally, the results of the first four state caucuses/primaries were significant indicators, though he thought the vast majority of Americans should have their chance to weigh in; I'm convinced he was very sincere in that commitment until this week.

Many have noted that he just couldn't get much attention in the corporate-owned media. True, that had to have been frustrating, and been wearing him down. Apparently it wore Elizabeth out, since after New Hampshire, she went home with the kids.

But I think when he saw the exit polls from South Carolina — and the opinion surveys from Super Tuesday states — he began to rethink his plan to stay in. He was very clearly getting much of his support from white men who did not want to vote for a woman or a black man.

At the top of his speech yesterday, he said it was time to “step aside so that history can blaze its path.” To me this spoke volumes. Each of his two major opponents, once elected, would break down a huge barrier to justice in this country. John Edwards is not a man who would want to be the catchall candidate for racists, sexists and every street corner Clinton basher and Hillary hater in America. He did not want this to tarnish his name or electoral legacy. And I don't blame him.

That's my theory, anyway. I'm sure the decision was a complicated one for a man, for a family, that is intelligent, empathetic and dedicated to their cause and country. But I think his inherent love of social justice just couldn't let him be the vessel for hatred, his political ambition be damned. In my opinion, he's the kind of man who would make that kind of selfless sacrifice.

If I'm right, then it's just more evidence that we haven't seen the last of John and Elizabeth Edwards on the national — even global — stage. They have bigger cause than their own careers or lives. Then they can serve without unwanted baggage they collected from those whose beliefs they do not share.

Then there won't be any need for JRE to get out of the way of history, because he (and Elizabeth) will be leading us to it from the front.

I look forward to that.

(Cross posted at Daily Kos.)

Edwards ends campaign for president

January 30, 2008

I woke up this morning to news that Edwards was quitting the campaign. He'll be making the official announcement at Noon (Central). I'll watch, have a good cry, and then probably swear off electoral politics.

I think John is thinking that he will have to find (or return to) another way to address the issues of justice that motivated him to run. I suspect that he will not be interested in the vice presidential slot, if it were offered by Clinton or Obama. I'm certainly of that mind.

He ran a good campaign, focused on issues and ideas, and influenced the other campaigns to do the same — even got the media to get off the horse race and trivia occasionally. Not a small contribution, but unfortunately, now we “return to our regular programming.”

Update:

Here is the full text of an email from the campaign I received this afternoon.

Dear Rena,

Let me start by saying, “Thank you.” You have stood with Elizabeth and me throughout this campaign. Your support has sustained us as we have traveled across this country.

Earlier today, I suspended my campaign for the Democratic nomination for the presidency. I made this announcement from where our journey began just over 12 months ago: New Orleans.

I began my presidential campaign in New Orleans to remind the country that all of us — as citizens and as a government — have a moral responsibility to each other, and what we do together matters.

Now, it's time for me to step aside so that history can blaze its path. We do not know who will take the final steps to the White House — but what we do know is that our Democratic Party will make history.

And, along the way, all of you who have been involved in this campaign and this movement for change and this cause, I am asking you to continue speaking out for those who have no voice, just as Elizabeth and I will continue to do. We need you.

Do not turn away from the great struggles before us. Do not give up on the causes that we have fought for. Do not walk away from what's possible, because it's time for all of us — all of us together — to make the two Americas one. We need you.

I hope you will take a few moments to listen to the video clip of my speech in New Orleans earlier this afternoon or to read it below.

In the meantime, Elizabeth and my family join me in thanking all of you for your support and for working so hard on my behalf. We are truly blessed to have such friends.

Thank you.

John Edwards
January 30, 2008

Thank you.Thank you all very much. We're very proud to be back here.

During the spring of 2006, I had the extraordinary experience of bringing 700 college kids here to New Orleans to work. These are kids who gave up their spring break to come to New Orleans to work, to rehabilitate houses, because of their commitment as Americans, because they believed in what was possible, and because they cared about their country.

I began my presidential campaign here to remind the country that we, as citizens and as a government, have a moral responsibility to each other, and what we do together matters. We must do better, if we want to live up to the great promise of this country that we all love so much.

It is appropriate that I come here today. It's time for me to step aside so that history can blaze its path. We do not know who will take the final steps to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, but what we do know is that our Democratic Party will make history. We will be strong, we will be unified, and with our convictions and a little backbone we will take back the White House in November and we'll create hope and opportunity for this country.

This journey of ours began right here in New Orleans. It was a December morning in the Lower Ninth Ward when people went to work, not just me, but lots of others went to work with shovels and hammers to help restore a house that had been destroyed by the storm.

We joined together in a city that had been abandoned by our government and had been forgotten, but not by us. We knew that they still mourned the dead, that they were still stunned by the destruction, and that they wondered when all those cement steps in all those vacant lots would once again lead to a door, to a home, and to a dream.

We came here to the Lower Ninth Ward to rebuild. And we're going to rebuild today and work today, and we will continue to come back. We will never forget the heartache and we'll always be here to bring them hope, so that someday, one day, the trumpets will sound in Musicians' Village, where we are today, play loud across Lake Ponchartrain, so that working people can come marching in and those steps once again can lead to a family living out the dream in America.

We sat with poultry workers in Mississippi, janitors in Florida, nurses in California.

We listened as child after child told us about their worry about whether we would preserve the planet.

We listened to worker after worker say “the economy is tearing my family apart.”

We walked the streets of Cleveland, where house after house was in foreclosure.

And we said, “We're better than this. And economic justice in America is our cause.”

And we spent a day, a summer day, in Wise, Virginia, with a man named James Lowe, who told us the story of having been born with a cleft palate. He had no health care coverage. His family couldn't afford to fix it. And finally some good Samaritan came along and paid for his cleft palate to be fixed, which allowed him to speak for the first time. But they did it when he was 50 years old. His amazing story, though, gave this campaign voice: universal health care for every man, woman and child in America. That is our cause.

And we do this — we do this for each other in America. We don't turn away from a neighbor in their time of need. Because every one of us knows that what — but for the grace of God, there goes us. The American people have never stopped doing this, even when their government walked away, and walked away it has from hardworking people, and, yes, from the poor, those who live in poverty in this country.

For decades, we stopped focusing on those struggles. They didn't register in political polls, they didn't get us votes and so we stopped talking about it. I don't know how it started. I don't know when our party began to turn away from the cause of working people, from the fathers who were working three jobs literally just to pay the rent, mothers sending their kids to bed wrapped up in their clothes and in coats because they couldn't afford to pay for heat.

We know that our brothers and sisters have been bullied into believing that they can't organize and can't put a union in the workplace. Well, in this campaign, we didn't turn our heads. We looked them square in the eye and we said, “We see you, we hear you, and we are with you. And we will never forget you.” And I have a feeling that if the leaders of our great Democratic Party continue to hear the voices of working people, a proud progressive will occupy the White House.

Now, I've spoken to both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama. They have both pledged to me and more importantly through me to America, that they will make ending poverty central to their campaign for the presidency.

And more importantly, they have pledged to me that as President of the United States they will make ending poverty and economic inequality central to their Presidency. This is the cause of my life and I now have their commitment to engage in this cause.

And I want to say to everyone here, on the way here today, we passed under a bridge that carried the interstate where 100 to 200 homeless Americans sleep every night. And we stopped, we got out, we went in and spoke to them.

There was a minister there who comes every morning and feeds the homeless out of her own pocket. She said she has no money left in her bank account, she struggles to be able to do it, but she knows it's the moral, just and right thing to do. And I spoke to some of the people who were there and as I was leaving, one woman said to me, “You won't forget us, will you? Promise me you won't forget us.” Well, I say to her and I say to all of those who are struggling in this country, we will never forget you. We will fight for you. We will stand up for you.

But I want to say this — I want to say this because it's important. With all of the injustice that we've seen, I can say this, America's hour of transformation is upon us. It may be hard to believe when we have bullets flying in Baghdad and it may be hard to believe when it costs $58 to fill your car up with gas. It may be hard to believe when your school doesn't have the right books for your kids. It's hard to speak out for change when you feel like your voice is not being heard.

But I do hear it. We hear it. This Democratic Party hears you. We hear you, once again. And we will lift you up with our dream of what's possible.

One America, one America that works for everybody.

One America where struggling towns and factories come back to life because we finally transformed our economy by ending our dependence on oil.

One America where the men who work the late shift and the women who get up at dawn to drive a two-hour commute and the young person who closes the store to save for college. They will be honored for that work. One America where no child will go to bed hungry because we will finally end the moral shame of 37 million people living in poverty.

One America where every single man, woman and child in this country has health care.

One America with one public school system that works for all of our children.

One America that finally brings this war in Iraq to an end. And brings our service members home with the hero's welcome that they have earned and that they deserve.

Today, I am suspending my campaign for the Democratic nomination for the Presidency.

But I want to say this to everyone: with Elizabeth, with my family, with my friends, with all of you and all of your support, this son of a millworker's gonna be just fine. Our job now is to make certain that America will be fine.

And I want to thank everyone who has worked so hard

Margaret Cho tour to include Grand Prairie, Texas

January 30, 2008

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usOne of my favorite performing artists, Margaret Cho, will be taking her latest show “Beautiful” on tour, starting in Australia on Feb. 27 and ending (as of now) in Atlanta in June.

This time, finally, she'll be doing one show within driving distance for me, and I hope I can make it. April 27, at the Nokia Theatre in Grand Prairie, TX, which is between Fort Worth and Dallas. Ticket info from the site: Fan Club Pre-sale starts 1/30, Password: Beautiful

Tet, 40 years later

January 30, 2008

Consortiumnews.com has published an article noting the 40th anniversary of the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, written by Don North, “who spent three years as a reporter in Vietnam for ABC and NBC News, has continued investigating the details of this historic battle over the past 40 years.” He was outside the U.S. embassy in Saigon when the attack began.

The editors' intro puts North's piece in context:

On Jan. 31, 1968, the North Vietnamese and Vietcong attacked the U.S. Embassy in Saigon and more than 100 other targets throughout South Vietnam. The assault was dubbed the Tet Offensive, named after the Vietnamese celebration of the Lunar New Year.

When the bloody fighting finally ended 24 days later, the communist troops had been driven from all major South Vietnamese cities and senior U.S. military officers declared victory. But there was little doubt, too, that the North Vietnamese and Vietcong had scored a stunning psychological success.

Because U.S. politicians and commanders had oversold progress in the war as a way to quiet domestic dissent, the savage Tet fighting shocked millions of Americans and widened Washington

New York NOW attacks Kennedy for supporting Obama over Clinton

January 29, 2008

As a lifelong feminist, I find this statement extremely offensive. Not only because, while it is supposed to represent the thinking of feminists in one of the largest states in the nation, it sounds like it was written by an 8th grader, but because it presumes that feminists and pro-feminist men MUST support Hillary Clinton for president or they have committed the “ultimate betrayal.”

Crap!

I have a long history as an activist for equal rights and justice for women, people of color and other groups. I have longed for the time when this country would elect someone other than a white (usually Protestant) male as President.

I supported the presidential aspirations (either in primaries or in the general election) of Shirley Chisolm, Sonia Johnson, Patricia Shroeder, Jesse Jackson (twice) and even Al Sharpton. So I'm ready for both a woman and a person of color to hold our highest office. I was ready a long damn time ago.

But I am not ready to support a corporatist sell-out just because she's female. And I'm not ready to install another member of some American political dynasty, just because the Heathers club that is NY-NOW says I should. That's not any kind of feminism I'd have anything to do with, or that any self-respecting progressive should promote.

Would I love it if my candidate of choice for 2008, John Edwards, was not a white man, but rather a black woman with the same ideas, determination and courage? You bet. That would be a perfect combination all things political as far as I'm concerned. But he's not. And I don't hold it against him. John Edwards' positions are so much more progressive, and dare I say “feminist,” than Hillary Clinton's, it's not even funny.

Hell, I have a hard time even thinking of Hillary Clinton as even a liberal or a leftist, despite what the “VRWC” thinks of her. Those morons don't have a frickin' clue about the reality of the political spectrum in this country (much less the rest of the world). Much like NY-NOW, apparently.

I'm enraged that this bunch has embarrassed real feminists with their sophmoric bile. Women have enough to complain about politically and culturally without having to explain this kind of nonsense.

I passed through NOW very early in my political activism, but I still felt like it was a decent, if hopelessly DC-centric and mainstream (in the negative sense) organization. But if national NOW doesn't put out some kind of disclaimer on this, they will have completely destroyed any hope at being a voice for working class American women, and certainly ever representing women of color (which they never were anyway).

Special 'Homeless Vets Awareness' fundraiser day for John Edwards, Wednesday 1/30/08

January 29, 2008

Many Netroots supporters of John Edwards, while not ignoring the obvious, are not giving up any more than the candidate is.

Like me, they see his staying in the race as a way to make the two frontrunners take up his progressive ideas and policy proposals. He's already had that kind of influence, but there's a lot more that can and needs to be picked up before anyone is ready to call it quits. And it is becoming obvious even to the corporate media that he quite possibly will end up with some degree of power at the convention in Denver.

Liza at Culture Kitchen:

I want you to stay in the race until the end.

I want you to get as many delegates as you can.

I want you to go into the convention as the guy who will make a difference.

King maker? I hate that term.

Yet having you in Colorado as the party's main ball buster would just be awesomely sweet. Because, when it comes down to it, you could be the guy to decide in which direction the Democratic Party is going to go. You could be the guy to decide if the dynastic status quo of the Clintons wins of if the sea change behind Obama becomes a true progressive movement.

 

Cargill resigns leadership of OK House!

January 28, 2008

Just got a news flash from the Journal Record with astounding news:

STATE HOUSE SPEAKER RESIGNS POST OVER TAX FLAP
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) – Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill resigned from the House's top job Monday following published reports that he submitted late property tax payments and failed to file state personal income tax returns. Cargill notified members of the House's GOP majority of his resignation by telephone during a conference call that Republican House members took in their individual offices. Cargill did not appear personally before caucus members but planned to make a public statement later Monday.

Sargent Shriver

January 27, 2008

(Updated below with links to some very interesting articles on Shriver, his biography, and the film.)

Unable to sleep, I spent most of last night channel surfing. I came upon a program on pbs that made my insomnia worthwhile: a showing of American Idealist: The Story of Sargent Shriver.

What a great film, and inspiring life! Of course, I knew a little about Sargent Shriver; I knew he was JFK's brother in law and was tapped by him to run the Peace Corps. I also knew he had run as McGovern's VP in 72 after Eagleton's history of depression became public (the stigma of mental health issues was even greater then than it is now).

But I found out a lot I didn't know, and a lot of details about the years of the Peace Corps, and the other Great Society programs that Shriver initiated: Job Corps, VISTA, Legal Services, Head Start, and on and on.

He has become a somewhat forgotten figure, which is too bad, because his life, his ideals, his victories, his defeats are all extremely instructive today. I think if the Obama phenomenon continues, study of Shriver's life might be all the more relevant. But I highly recommend this film (and related books and web sites) to all progressive activists concerned about the same values that drove Shriver: equality, justice, peace.

Sadly, Shriver was denied the VP slot twice before McGovern called. Johnson really wanted him to run with him in 64, and Hubert Humphrey had him on the short list in 68. But, both times, the Kennedy machine let it be known that bypassing the direct line of Kennedy kin would not be tolerated. We'll never know, but it could be argued that Humphrey could have narrowly beat Nixon in 68 with Shriver on the ticket, which would have meant a very different campaign that reached out to youthful antiwar protesters instead of denouncing them. If that had happened, the history of this country would be very, very different. Probably for the better.

Shriver is still living; he has advanced Alzheimer's.

I'll probably buy the DVD (update: not available for regular purchase; I'll try to acquire it for local organization and do a public showing), because I found the story very uplifting despite some of the tragic elements, the opportunities missed or great programs ruined by politics and ego. For a peace and justice activist, I'd call this required viewing. I'll probably also now read the biography (Sarge, published in 2004, with forward by Bill Moyers), and may then update this entry.

Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargent_Shriver


More articles and resources added 1/28/08:

The Call to Service by Scott Stossel – biographer talks about the life and legacy of Sargent Shriver (The Atlantic, 4/2004)

Knifed by Scott Stossel – focuses on how the Kennedy clan kept Shriver from higher office (Atlantic article, May 2004)

A Muscular Idealism by Bob Herbert (Opinion column, NY Times 4/2004)

AP article about the biography (April, 2004)

On the 40th Anniversary of the War on Poverty: Same Folks, Different Strokes by Laura Flanders (Published on Monday, January 12, 2004 by TomPaine.com)

Newsblaze article about the documentary (1/2008)

Press release from Chicago Video Project about the film 's broadcast on PBS (1/2008)

Tom Shales' Washington Post column about the film (1/2008)

From Lanny Davis's entry at Huffington Post on the PBS broadcast:

But for me, his most important legacy during his years heading the Peace Corps and the War on Poverty–young people doing public service to assist and teach the disadvantaged at home and abroad; and the one most relevant to today's politics is that he proved – and I mean proved beyond the shadow of a doubt – that a socially conscientious and caring federal government can be a friend of the average American, not the enemy that many conservatives believe and would have Americans believe.

A reaction to seeing the documentary from blogger “People Power Granny”:
We need another War on Poverty with a Different Name

One day of Iraq war

January 25, 2008

Freddie and the Dreamers: You were made for me

January 20, 2008

Last night, I found this song video (“You were made for me”) on the end of an old VHS tape, as filler after a movie recorded off AMC. I thought at first that it was a more contemporary satire. But no, apparently this group was on the pop charts and TV during the period when my family were either without TV entirely (Alaska), or only had limited access to English language programming.

Anyway, I got a big kick out of it. (No pun intended!)